Self-Determination or Exploitation? The Feminist Debate on Surrogacy
Main Article Content
Abstract
Within feminism there is no unified perspective on surrogate pregnancy (SP). Feminist disagreement generally translates into a debate between defending autonomy and protection from exploitation and oppression. This formula, however, overlooks the common feminist framework of the debate, within which limiting oppression and promoting women’s autonomy should be considered shared goals. I will advance the debate by analyzing these shared objectives by appealing to contemporary literature on personal autonomy. I will argue that the models of autonomy assumed by those who defend SP as a form of self-determination mask significant forms of oppression in contemporary contexts and that it is only by adopting a particular conception of autonomy that feminist proposals contrary to SP can be seen as hostile to autonomy. I conclude that reflecting and legislating on SP requires models of autonomy that are sensitive to different forms of oppression.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Esta es una publicación bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC- ND 4.0). Para mayor información sobre el uso no comercial de los contenidos que aquí aparecen, favor de consultar http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
References
Bartky, Sandra L. 1990. Femininity and Domination, Nueva York, Routledge.
Benson, Paul. 1991. “Autonomy and Oppressive Socialization”, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 17, núm. 3, pp. 385-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract199117319
Benson, Paul. 2000. “Feeling Crazy: Self Worth and the Social Character of Responsibility”, en Catriona Mackenzie y Natalie Stoljar (comp.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, pp. 72-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195123333.003.0004
Bhattacharya, Tithi. 2017. Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression [e-book], Londres, Pluto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1997. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”, en Karen Maschke (comp.), Feminist Legal Theories, Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 23-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782063.003.0016
Denny, Elaine. 1994. “Liberation or Oppression? Radical Feminism and In Vitro Fertilization”, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 16, núm. 1, pp .62-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347010
Dworkin, Gerald. 1976. “Autonomy and Behavior Control”, The Hastings Center Report, vol. 6, núm. 1, pp. 23-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3560358
Finlayson, Lorna. 2016. An Introduction to Feminism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316343579
Khader, Serene J. 2011. Adaptive Preferences and Women's Empowerment, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777884.001.0001
Lamm, Eleonora. 2012. Gestación por sustitución. Ni maternidad subrogada ni alquiler de vientres (vol. 2), Barcelona, Edicions Universitat Barcelona.
Lewis, Sophie. 2019. Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family [e-book], Londres, Verso.
Marway, Herheet y Heather Widdows. 2015. “Philosophical Feminist Bioethics: Past, Present, and Future”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, vol. 24, núm. 2, pp. 165-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000474
Oksala, Johanna. 2011. “The Neoliberal Subject of Feminism”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, vol. 1, núm. 42, pp. 104-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2011.11006733
Oksala, Johanna. 2014. “In Defense of Experience”, Hypatia, vol. 29, núm. 2, pp. 388-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12053
Olavarría, María Eugenia. 2023. “Todxs somos subrogadxs” (reseña de Lewis 2019), Debate Feminista, vol. 66, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2023.66.2369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2023.66.2369
Oshana, Marina. 2006. Personal Autonomy in Society, Aldershot, Ashgate.
Pande, Amrita., 2014. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India, Nueva York, Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/pand16990
Pérez Hernández, Yolinliztli. 2018. “Gestación subrogada: una revisión etnográfica para contribuir al debate en México”, Debate feminista, vol. 56, pp. 85-109. https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2018.56.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2018.56.05
Rodríguez Apólito, Maite. 2022. “Against Authenticity: Autonomy and Oppressive Circumstances”, Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 50, núm. 5, pp. 803-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221133485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221133485
Scott, Joan W. 1991. “The Evidence of Experience”, Critical inquiry, vol. 17, núm. 4, pp. 773-797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448612
Segalen, Martine (entrevista). 2019. “Quelques questions à Martine Segalen, ethnologue opposée à la GPA”, À gauche (en línea). Disponible en <https://agauche.org/2019/09/25/quelques-questions-a-martine-segalen-ethnologue-opposee-a-la-gpa/#:~:text=Nous%20avons%20posé%20quelques%20questions,et%20aux%20couples%20de%20lesbiennes>.
Segalen, Martine. 2006. “De l’invisibilité dans la domination à la visibilité dans l’égalité? La place des femmes dans les sciences sociales en France”, Memoria y Civilización, núm. 9, pp. 139-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/001.9.33737
Segalen, Martine. 2017. “Why There Can Be no Such Thing as ‘Ethical’ Surrogacy”, Travail, genre et sociétés, vol. 38, núm. 2, pp. 53-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/tgs.038.0053
Segalen, Martine. 2021. “Deconstructing Social Anthropology Discourses in Their Support of Surrogacy: The Case of France”, Current Sociology Monograph, vol. 69, núm. 2, pp. 176-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120964901
Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. “Autonomy and the Feminist Intuition”, en Catriona Mackenzie y Natalie Stoljar (comp.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, pp. 94-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195123333.003.0005
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, Princeton University Press.